Comparison
SpaceJump vs Timing
Two different approaches to automatic time tracking on Mac. Which one fits your workflow?
Our Verdict
SpaceJump is better for freelancers who organize work by client/project
If you already use separate Mac Spaces for different clients or projects, SpaceJump gives you automatic time tracking with zero configuration. Timing is better if you work across many apps and need detailed app-level tracking with manual categorization.
SpaceJump is best for:
- One Space per client = automatic tracking
- No manual categorization needed
- Works completely offline
- One-time purchase ($9.99)
- Quick Switcher for fast navigation
Timing is best for:
- Tracks time by app and document
- Detailed timeline view
- Web and calendar integration
- iOS companion app
- Team features available
Feature Comparison
| Feature | SpaceJump | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic time tracking | ||
| No manual timers needed | ||
| Tracks by workspace/Space | ||
| Tracks by app/document | ||
| Manual categorization required | ||
| Works offline | ||
| Idle time detection | ||
| CSV export | ||
| Menu bar indicator | ||
| Quick Switcher | ||
| Jump back to previous Space | ||
| One-time purchase | $9.99 | €89/year |
| iOS app | ||
| Team features |
Frequently Asked Questions
It depends on your workflow. SpaceJump is better if you organize work by client/project using Mac Spaces—it tracks time automatically with zero configuration. Timing is better if you need to track time across many apps and documents with detailed categorization.
For freelancers who use one Space per client, yes. SpaceJump automatically tracks time per workspace without manual categorization. If you need app-level tracking or team features, Timing might be a better fit.
SpaceJump is $9.99 one-time. Timing is €89/year (or €199 one-time for the Pro version). SpaceJump is significantly cheaper for long-term use.